The planning commission supported the undertaking in February at the cost of about Rs 25 crores. The narrative of the creation of the Silent Valley provides valuable exercises throughout the nation and outside for governments and natural innovations.
In the last part of the s and the mids, the development against the development of a dam in the Silent Valley Forests near Palakkad was the first of its kind in Quite a while. Before that, the overall experience was that developments against enormous dams and hydroelectric companies were initiated by local people who were affected.
Yet, due to the Silent Valley Initiative, there was no compelling cause for even a small population to clear up. The primary concern of the people who began the production was the adverse effect the business would have on the environment. The construction of the Idukki hydroelectric company was approaching completion in and the state government was looking for new hydroelectric tasks to fulfill the power requirements of the state.
The legislature approved the initiative in and decided to proceed with the task. The same year, an investigation was conducted by the Kerala Forest Research Institute KFRI in Peechi, near Thrissur, into the conceivable impact of an undertaking on forests in the state. The inquiry concluded that the Silent Valley evergreen tropical jungles would be completely decimated by the undertaking.
He took it to the educator M. Prasad, an instructor of herbal science and a functioning person from the Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad, an association established in the state to spread logical knowledge. At that time, the group had settled itself as one with a vision to take science to the people. It had a grassroots level organization and its individuals were some notable scholars and scholarly citizens of the state.
Assessments were isolated into the leading board of the KSSP in the underlying phases, and a portion of the people argued that slowing down the mission would hinder the improvement of the state.
The KSSP resolved in that the venture would have genuine unfriendly ecological outcomes, after ample exploration of the practicality as well as the biological sections of the assignment. The profit of the venture was found not to be equivalent to the expense in question. A legislature led by P. A party from Congress drove by A. Various members of the decision-making front were Antony, the Muslim League, and the Kerala Congress. Famous writers from Kerala join the movement and contribute their skills: poems, plays, stories and articles, to convey the message to the ordinary citizen.
He institutes a Central Committee to re-investigate the issue, headed by M. Swaminathan, much to the chagrin of the Chief Minister of Kerala. Work on the project begins again in earnest.
Meanwhile, a small group of campaigners meet the Kerala Governor and request her to issue a stay order against continuing work on the project until the Committee set up by the Centre gives its report.
She agrees, and work is halted once again. On the streets, the awareness campaigns continue. The role of the media: In the media too, the fight for Silent Valley marks a distinct curve. The leading Malayalam newspapers first carry positive columns on the hydroelectric project.
Some publications even take potshots at the lion-tailed macaque, which has become a symbol of the wildlife that the environmentalists are trying to protect in Silent Valley.
The Express, a local daily, is an exception. In , a slight shift in newspaper reportage is noticeable. Along with support for the project, some newspapers raise concern for the ecological consequences of destroying the rainforest. Malayalam Manorama, a popular magazine, although inclined to view the project favourably, opens up its letters and features columns to environmental opinions.
At first, few national newspapers consider the environment a particularly interesting subject, and the Silent Valley battles that are raging in Kerala may well be in another continent. The political push and shove that the project endures eventually gets the newspapers to cover the opposition to the project. The Indian Express, with its many southern editions, is ideally placed to pick up the issue.
The Hindu regularly features editorials on the subject. In August , the paper carries a full-page report on the flora and fauna of Silent Valley. The letters section of the paper attracts several eminent people, among them Rom Whitaker, M.
Prasad, Madhav Gadgil. The eminent naturalist, M. Silent Valley is more important than them all — the last authentic sizeable evergreen forests left.
He is replaced by Indira Gandhi. Luckily for the conservation movement, she takes an active personal interest in the Silent Valley project, as national and international pressure mounts. January : Bowing to unrelenting public pressure, Indira Gandhi declares that Silent Valley will be protected.
However — when the fine print is read — it is learned that the area under the hydroelectric project is not covered under the protected area! More pressure is heaped on the government by NGOs, reputed scientists and intellectuals, and ordinary citizens.
June : the Centre re-examines the issue through a commission chaired by Prof. Most of the information is new to me and thanks for the enlightenment. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. Create your free account to read unlimited documents. Movement against hydroelectric project. The SlideShare family just got bigger. Home Explore Login Signup. Successfully reported this slideshow. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads.
You can change your ad preferences anytime. Next SlideShares. You are reading a preview. Create your free account to continue reading. Sign Up. Upcoming SlideShare. What to Upload to SlideShare. Embed Size px. Start on.
Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Share Email. Top clipped slide. Download Now Download Download to read offline.
0コメント